Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio

2223 POSTS 0 COMMENTS

Case Law Updates

Constructive refoulement?

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 14 February 2026

Case Law Updates

Confusing letter, as there was no authorised recipient?

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 13 February 2026

Case Law Updates

‘National interest’ in s 501BA interpreted

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 12 February 2026

Legislative Updates

ART to make some decisions “on the papers”

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 11 February 2026

Case Law Updates

Is novelty sufficient to depart from ordinary costs rule?

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 10 February 2026

Case Law Updates

XKTK distinguished?

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 9 February 2026

Case Law Updates

Attributing “responsibility or blame to Australia for a non-citizen’s conduct”?

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 9 February 2026

Case Law Updates

Legally unreasonable to weigh impediments heavily if protection finding exists?

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 4 February 2026

Case Law Updates

Minister saw himself as bound to apply Direction?

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 27 January 2026

Case Law Updates

AAT’s apprehended bias?

Sergio Zanotti Stagliorio - 22 January 2026

1...678...223 Page 7 of 223

Migration Legislation Tracker

VACs, TSMIT and more

Arrangements for subclass 417 (working holiday) visa

Arrangements for subclass 462 (work and holiday)

Nil VAC arrangements

Does s 501(2) carry implied temporal limitation?

Should FCA determine facts in case XMBQ is overturned?

Substantial compliance despite lack of explanation of Acts Interpretation Act?

Good faith a defence to tort arising from unlawful detention?

Section 501(3A) cancellation invalid ab initio if imprisonment term is later…

Constructive refoulement?

Confusing letter, as there was no authorised recipient?

‘National interest’ in s 501BA interpreted

ART to make some decisions “on the papers”

Is novelty sufficient to depart from ordinary costs rule?

XKTK distinguished?

Attributing “responsibility or blame to Australia for a non-citizen’s conduct”?

Legally unreasonable to weigh impediments heavily if protection finding exists?

Minister saw himself as bound to apply Direction?

AAT’s apprehended bias?