‘Without limiting the matters to be covered by the review, the review must consider the performance of: (a) immigration lawyers; (b) legal profession complaints handling systems and disciplinary procedures with respect to the activities of immigration lawyers’
The Migration Amendment (Regulation of Migration Agents) Bill 2018 (Deregulation Bill) is scheduled to be debated in the Senate today.
Senator McKim is expected to move amendments to the Deregulation Bill on behalf of the Australian Greens as follows:
(1) Page 3 (after line 11), after clause 3, insert:
4 Independent review of operation of Schedule 1
(1) The Minister must cause an independent review to be conducted of the operation of the amendments made by Schedule 1 to this Act.
(2) Without limiting the matters to be covered by the review, the review must consider the performance of:
(a) immigration lawyers; and
(b) legal profession complaints handling systems and disciplinary procedures with respect to the activities of immigration lawyers.
(3) The review must:
(a) start as soon as practicable after the end of 3 years after Schedule 1 commences; and
(b) be completed within 6 months.
(4) The persons who conduct the review must give the Minister a written report of the review.
(5) The Minister must cause copies of the report to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the report is given to the Minister.
(6) In this section:
immigration lawyer means an Australian legal practitioner who provides immigration
Disclaimer: the above is a mere extract of a proposed amendment to a Bill. The views there expressed not reflect the views of the Department, the AAT or the courts. The law or policies might have changed between the writing and reading of this article. The author of this article and Migration Law Updates disclaim any liability for any action (or omission) on their part based on any information provided (or not provided) in this article and are under no obligation to keep the general public nor practitioners informed about the matters discussed in this article or any other matters, or any future changes to any of those matters. It is the responsibility of each practitioner to obtain access to primary sources of law and policy by themselves and to carry out their own research and come to their own conclusions on legislation, case law, policies and more. This article is not intended for the general public.