Federal Court. Was the duration of a relationship with a partner visa sponsor an irrelevant consideration for the purpose of cl 820.211(2)(d)(ii) of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)? Could the registration of a de facto relationship be seen as a compelling reason to waive the criteria in Schedule 3?
Cl 820.211(2)(d)(ii) of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) provided as follows: "in the case of an applicant who is not the holder of a substantive visa... the applicant satisfies Schedule 3 criteria 3001, 3003 and 3004, unless the Minister is satisfied that there are compelling reasons for not applying those criteria".
Some of the questions to the Federal Court (FCA) were as follows:
Question 1: Was the duration of a relationship with a partner visa sponsor an irrelevant consideration for the purpose of cl 820.211(2)(d)(ii)?
Question 2: Could the registration of a de facto relationship be seen as a compelling reason to waive the criteria in Schedule 3?
The FCA answered those questions as follows:
The remainder of this article is only available to Case Law and Platinum subscribers.
Read our Terms & Conditions and upgrade below:
Monthly Subscriptions
Annual Subscriptions
Where GST applies, the above amounts are inclusive of GST.
Content Types
Basic Content includes basic news, some media articles and selected announcements.
Premium Content includes all our content, except for Case Law Content. In other words, it includes Basic Content, plus all our articles on legislative and policy changes, industry updates and the Migration Legislation Tracker.
Case Law Content includes Basic Content, plus case law summaries, analysis and extract, but does not include Premium Content.
Platinum Content includes Basic Content, plus Premium Content, plus Case Law Content. In other words, it includes ALL our content.
If you already have a Case Law or Platinum subscription, click on 'Login' below.