Federal Court. Is the validity of an application to the Tribunal under s 500 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) a jurisdictional fact? By finding that the review application was out of time, did the Tribunal implicitly found that that application was invalid? Did the mere sending of a bundle of documents to the Tribunal constitute a valid Tribunal application?
Some of the questions to the Federal Court (FCA) were as follows:
Question 1: Is the validity of an application to the Tribunal under s 500 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) a jurisdictional fact?
Question 2: By finding that the review application was out of time, did the Tribunal implicitly found that that application was invalid?
Question 3: Did the sending of a bundle of documents to the Tribunal, without the required application form and without a separate statement of reasons for the application, constitute a valid Tribunal application?
The FCA answered those questions as follows:
The remainder of this article is only available to Case Law and Platinum subscribers.
Read our Terms & Conditions and upgrade below:
Monthly Subscriptions
Annual Subscriptions
Where GST applies, the above amounts are inclusive of GST.
Content Types
Basic Content includes basic news, some media articles and selected announcements.
Premium Content includes all our content, except for Case Law Content. In other words, it includes Basic Content, plus all our articles on legislative and policy changes, industry updates and the Migration Legislation Tracker.
Case Law Content includes Basic Content, plus case law summaries, analysis and extract, but does not include Premium Content.
Platinum Content includes Basic Content, plus Premium Content, plus Case Law Content. In other words, it includes ALL our content.
If you already have a Case Law or Platinum subscription, click on 'Login' below.