Federal Court: It is often said that jurisdictional errors made by an original decision-maker are always irrelevant to a merits review application, given that the Tribunal will make a decision de novo. However, that is not always the case, as this decision illustrates.
Although this decision did not involve the Department of Immigration, it has precedential value to migration decisions, especially because it cites several judgements on migration matters.
As the Federal Court (FCA) initially said, a 'person is not entitled to challenge an administrative decision on natural justice or other grounds where there has been a comprehensive appeal or review which has “cured” any defect touching the earlier decision'.
However, there are circumstances where a jurisdictional error made by an original decision-maker will not be irrelevant to a merits review application, as the FCA went on to explain...
The remainder of this article is only available to Case Law and Platinum subscribers.
Read our Terms & Conditions and upgrade below:
Where GST applies, the above amounts are inclusive of GST.
Basic Content includes basic news, some media articles and selected announcements.
Premium Content includes all our content, except for Case Law Content. In other words, it includes Basic Content, plus all our articles on legislative and policy changes, industry updates and the Migration Legislation Tracker.
Case Law Content includes Basic Content, plus case law summaries, analysis and extract, but does not include Premium Content.
Platinum Content includes Basic Content, plus Premium Content, plus Case Law Content. In other words, it includes ALL our content.
If you already have a Case Law or Platinum subscription, click on 'Login' below.