Federal Court. In assessing, for the purpose of a time extension application within which to bring judicial review proceedings, whether a proposed ground of review has any merit, is the issue to be determined at a relatively impressionistic level?
Some of the questions to the Federal Court (FCA) were as follows:
Question 1: In assessing, for the purpose of a time extension application within which to bring judicial review proceedings, whether a proposed ground of review has any merit, is the issue to be determined at a relatively impressionistic level?
Question 2: In assessing, for the purpose of a time extension application within which to bring judicial review proceedings, whether a proposed ground of review has any merit, should the the FCA generally not descend into a complete or full determination of the point which is sought to be raised?
The FCA answered those questions as follows:
The remainder of this article is only available to Case Law and Platinum subscribers.
Read our Terms & Conditions and upgrade below:
Monthly Subscriptions
Annual Subscriptions
Where GST applies, the above amounts are inclusive of GST.
Content Types
Basic Content includes basic news, some media articles and selected announcements.
Premium Content includes all our content, except for Case Law Content. In other words, it includes Basic Content, plus all our articles on legislative and policy changes, industry updates and the Migration Legislation Tracker.
Case Law Content includes Basic Content, plus case law summaries, analysis and extract, but does not include Premium Content.
Platinum Content includes Basic Content, plus Premium Content, plus Case Law Content. In other words, it includes ALL our content.
If you already have a Case Law or Platinum subscription, click on 'Login' below.